Freedom for IP
Freedom for IP Discussion List
Email:
  • Home
  • Blog
  • About Us
  • Case Law
  • Writings on IP
  • Other IP Organizations
  • Video

Feeds

Blog Feed | Comments Feed

Archives

  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
payday loan
ACTA is a Sham, Tell Congress!
Posted on May 25, 2010 in IP by Brian RoweComments Off

Fighting ACTA:

As a creator, consumer and constituent, I am very concerned about the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) being negotiated by the Office of the United States Trade Representative.  The agreement’s stated purpose was to coordinate a global effort to fight counterfeit products, but the language recently released by the U.S. Trade Representative — after two years of secrecy ridiculous  — shows clearly that ACTA is an attempt to change copyright without consulting the people!  This “wolf in sheep’s clothing” will do serious harm to Americans’ right to free speech and innovation on the Internet.

ACTA would set up a draconian global framework that could:

* Require Internet service providers (ISPs) to disconnect individuals accused (not convicted) of repeated copyright infringement; (no due process!)

* Require ISPs to hand over their subscribers’ identities to copyright owners without any due process or judicial oversight; (no privacy!)

* Require ISPs to make potentially expensive modifications to their networks in an effort to prevent copyright infringement; (waste for resources that should go to developing better broadband)

* Prohibit the U.S. Congress from reforming the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which makes it a crime to defeat copy protection even when making a copy is perfectly legal; (killing free speech rights)

* Require all countries to implement DMCA-like laws for their own populations, without the benefit of fair use or other legal exceptions that provide a modicum of protection for speech; (spreading the US’s anti-free speech, anti-circumvention laws to other)

* Threaten potential innovators with outrageous financial penalties for copyright infringement; and (creating a war on end users and transformative creators)

* Criminalize even non-commercial uses of copyrighted materials. (all NC use should be legal)

ACTA is being negotiated by a handful of countries behind closed doors and is on track to be finished by the end of this year.  Despite its potentially far-reaching impact for consumers and the future of the open Internet, the U.S. Trade Representative has claimed that it can shut out Congressional oversight by negotiating ACTA as a “sole executive agreement” under the President’s executive power, rather than a treaty.

Please don’t be fooled by ACTA’s dishonest name.  ACTA is not about trade, and it is certainly not limited to counterfeiting.  ACTA goes far beyond its original mandate of fighting counterfeit products, and it should not be allowed to damage the growth and development of American innovation.  I urge you to protect the American public and insist that ACTA be limited to its purported purpose — addressing counterfeit goods that pose serious health and safety concerns for consumers.

I just sent this to:
* Senator Maria E. Cantwell
* Representative Jim McDermott
Thx EFF, send your own.

PS I personalized the text a lot EFF’s text is a little more dry and less pro transformative creator. If you want people to read it needs to be in your voice.

Comments are closed.

Creative Commons License
This work is dedicated to the Public Domain.
It may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, used, modified, built upon,
or otherwise exploited by anyone for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial,
and in any way, including by methods that have not yet been invented or conceived.