<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Freedom for IP &#187; altlaw</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freedomforip.org/category/altlaw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freedomforip.org</link>
	<description>Dreaming of Intellectual Prosperity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:32:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>One More Strike Against FindLaw.com</title>
		<link>http://freedomforip.org/2008/08/20/one-more-strike-against-findlawcom/</link>
		<comments>http://freedomforip.org/2008/08/20/one-more-strike-against-findlawcom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Rowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[altlaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[findlaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freedomforip.org/?p=544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week FindLaw&#8217;s page rank was knocked from Page Rank 7 to Page Rank 5 that is two orders of magnitude.  Theoretically this a punishment for Findlaw abusing page rank and selling links from high ranked pages for large sums of money.  This has been standard policy of Google for sometime.  Google wants page rank [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week FindLaw&#8217;s page rank was knocked from Page Rank 7 to Page Rank 5 that is two orders of magnitude.  Theoretically this a punishment for Findlaw abusing page rank and selling links from high ranked pages for large sums of money.  This has been standard policy of Google for sometime.  Google wants page rank to be a measure of authority not cash.</p>
<p>Although this sounds like a big hit to find law it does not appear to be affecting there search results.</p>
<blockquote><p>the reduction (PR7 to PR5) is for the <em>visible PageRank</em> displayed in the <a href="http://toolbar.google.com/">Google Toolbar</a>. Does it effect the actual rankings? As of today, in Canada, when you search for ‘<strong>find lawyer</strong>‘, I’m getting FindLaw as the No. 1 result. I repeated the search over the phone with a US client, and FindLaw was No. 2. If Google had hit FindLaw with a <em>true penalty</em>, those results wouldn’t be happening. &#8211; Steven Mathews.</p></blockquote>
<p>I received similar results for &#8220;case law&#8221; keyword searches FindLaw kept coming up as the top result.  I admit it is nice to see <a href="http://www.altlaw.org/">Alt Law</a> at rank 6 and FindLaw at rank 5, but it appears to mean nothing in actual search results.  If Google is going to take action they should take action that affects actual search results.</p>
<p>Links:<br />
<a title="Permanent link to FindLaw Selling PageRank" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2008/findlaw-selling-pagerank/">FindLaw Selling PageRank</a> by <a href="http://www.stemlegal.com/steve-matthews/">Steve Matthews</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.oilman.ca/random/shame-shame-shame-findlaw/">Shame Shame FindLaw</a></p>
<p><a href="http://freedomforip.org/2007/10/25/westlaw-kills-findlaw-remove-your-links/">Remove your Links from FindLaw<br />
</a></p>
<p>Alternative:<br />
<a href="http://www.altlaw.org/">Altlaw.org</a></p>
<p>PS The absence of a link to FindLaw in this post was entirely intentional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freedomforip.org/2008/08/20/one-more-strike-against-findlawcom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Westlaw kills FindLaw, Remove your links</title>
		<link>http://freedomforip.org/2007/10/25/westlaw-kills-findlaw-remove-your-links/</link>
		<comments>http://freedomforip.org/2007/10/25/westlaw-kills-findlaw-remove-your-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 01:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Rowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[altlaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[findlaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westlaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freedomforip.org/blog/?p=116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several years ago FindLaw was the best free website for legal research. This is the Findlaw I fondly miss: http://web.archive.org/web/19970616074634/http://www.findlaw.com/index.html Look at the great features on the front page search for case, Supreme Court case, Laws and Code. Now look at the FindLaw of today: Since Westlaw purchased Findlaw it has been striped of utility [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several years ago FindLaw was the best free website for legal research. This is the Findlaw I fondly miss:</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.freedomforip.org/uploaded_images/goodfindlaw-798815.JPG"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://www.freedomforip.org/uploaded_images/goodfindlaw-798811.JPG" alt="" border="0" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://web.archive.org/web/19970616074634/http://www.findlaw.com/index.html">http://web.archive.org/web/19970616074634/http://www.findlaw.com/index.html</a></p>
<p>Look at the great features on the front page search for case, Supreme Court case, Laws and Code. </p>
<p>Now look at the FindLaw of today:<br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.freedomforip.org/uploaded_images/badfindlaw1-735605.JPG"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://www.freedomforip.org/uploaded_images/badfindlaw1-735600.JPG" alt="" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>Since Westlaw purchased Findlaw it has been striped of utility and litterd with obtrusive advertising.  WestLaw has even locked some of FindLaw&#8217;s content behind logins.  That is just what we need, our privacy striped away when viewing law.  FindLaw has become an advertising service with limited functionality and atrocious usability.</p>
<p>What is worse is that FindLaw has a page rank of 8!  WT%.   For a long time FindLaw was the only public resourse for online codes and caselaw.  Many wikipedia entries still link to findlaw cases that have been transformed from pages of useful text to pages full of ads and pop-ups.  Here is one example from the wikipedia entry for International Shoe Co. v. Washington</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.freedomforip.org/uploaded_images/badfindlaw2-769456.JPG"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://www.freedomforip.org/uploaded_images/badfindlaw2-769449.JPG" alt="" border="0" /></a><br />This is not the quality of external link Wikipedia is known for.   Legal contributors to Wikipedia should serious consider other options before linking to FindLaw.  The best alternative for case law right now is <a href="http://altlaw.org">AltLaw.org</a>.  A free service from Columbia Law School’s <a href="http://columbialawtech.org/">Program on         Law and Technology</a>, and the <a href="http://silicon-flatirons.org/">Silicon         Flatirons Program</a> at the University of         Colorado Law School.</p>
<p>Has Westlaw learned nothing from Google?  In purchasing Findlaw, WestLaw had an opportunity to provide an amazing service to the public, free accessible case law and code, but they have blown it, with too many ads and too little useful information.</p>
<p>Vote against Findlaw online, remove your links and send a message about quality online.  FFIP will be removing Findlaw from our links page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freedomforip.org/2007/10/25/westlaw-kills-findlaw-remove-your-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AltLaw = public domain law database</title>
		<link>http://freedomforip.org/2007/08/30/altlaw-public-domain-law-database/</link>
		<comments>http://freedomforip.org/2007/08/30/altlaw-public-domain-law-database/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Rowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[altlaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Domain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freedomforip.org/blog/?p=79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AltLaw is a free, open public, searchable database of federal cases. This is a huge step towards making justice and the legal system open to the public. Case law is currently monopolized by the Lexis and Westlaw locking the public away from the law. Case law creates the law and need to be open to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://altlaw.org">AltLaw</a> is a free, open public, searchable database of federal cases.  This is a huge step towards making justice and the legal system open to the public.  Case law is currently monopolized by the Lexis and Westlaw locking the public away from the law.  Case law creates the law and need to be open to everyone.  Altlaw is a great step in the right direction, my favorite part of the site is that it is under a CC Public Domain License.  This allow other to use the information and build on it. </p>
<p>I look forward to an external site adding comments on case or head notes creating public collection of shared knowlege about these case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://freedomforip.org/2007/08/30/altlaw-public-domain-law-database/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

