
This is the most explanatory motivating statement of what we are trying to work for that I have yet heard. If you understand this video, you understand a great deal of what Freedom for IP is working toward.
http://www.linuxworld.com/events/keynotes/lwsf06-lessig.html
Feeds
Tags
08NTC 09NTC A2K ACLU altlaw American University ATJ Blogs Budapest Open Access Initiative CC CC Tech Summit civil disobedience CLE congress copyfight Copyleft Copynight copyright Cory Doctorow creative commons DMCA DRM EFF ESP Event events Fair Use fc2008 File Sharing findlaw FOSS Free Culture free music FSF Google HarperCollins harry potter ignite igniteseattle India InfoCamp08 IPLS Ischool Isummit isummit08 KSR law law reviews lessig Lewis and Clark licensing linuxfest NW 2008 Michael Savage microsoft MPAA music Neil Gaiman nonprofits NOSI nptech NTC NTEN OLPC open access open access law open rights group open source orphaned works Ourspace Parady Patent patents patent trolls Pirate bay pirate party pirate party us privacy Propaganda Public Domain Pubpat Quote remix RIAA Rubbish Seattle Seattle University Seattle University Law Second Life SFFC SL SL Bar Social Justice SPARC Students for freeculture Students for Free Culture SU Law talks Tim Wu Trademarks UGC use it or lose it UW video games wiki WIPO WSBAATJ08
Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
Schneier on Security has an interesting post today about Microsoft's repeated patches to their DRM (which seem to come far more often than actual security patches). He thinks that Microsoft is fighting a losing game against crackers (can I call them crackers when they are only trying to access their own files for fair or unregulated uses?), and we could agree more! From the article:
In the absence of regulation, software liability, or some other mechanism to make unpatched software costly for the vendor, "Patch Tuesday" is the best users are likely to get.
Last week, a hacker developed an application called FairUse4WM that strips the copy protection from Windows Media DRM 10 and 11 files.
Now, this isn't a "vulnerability" in the normal sense of the word: digital rights management is not a feature that users want. Being able to remove copy protection is a good thing for some users, and completely irrelevant for everyone else. No user is ever going to say: "Oh no. I can now play the music I bought for my computer in my car. I must install a patch so I can't do that anymore."
It should surprise no one that the system didn't stay patched for long. FairUse4WM 1.2 gets around Microsoft's patch, and also circumvents the copy protection in Windows Media DRM 9 and 11beta2 files.
That was Saturday. Any guess on how long it will take Microsoft to patch Media Player once again? And then how long before the FairUse4WM people update their own software?
Certainly much less time than it will take Microsoft and the recording industry to realize they're playing a losing game, and that trying to make digital files uncopyable is like trying to make water not wet.
When is Microsoft going to learn what Google has known from the start? Usablility = user satisfaction = profit. Locking people in isn't the way to make money, Tzar Balmer, setting them free is!
